House Negro
Tuesday, March 08, 2005
 

The real value of human life

A major news item in today's press has been the sentence meted out to Jamiya Islamia 'spiritual leader' Abu Bakar Bashir. Alexander Downer said Australia was disappointed with the length of the sentence and would press Indonesia for a longer jail term. Let's ignore for the moment the fact that Australia is quite unashamedly meddling in the judicial process of another sovereign state (I seem to recall that whenever the UN criticises Australia's human rights record we often use the argument that the UN should not meddle in our domestic issues).

The current condemnation of the Indonesian court decision highlights the real weight placed on human life. You might recall that a few years ago Indonesia 'completed' its criminal trial of Indonesians suspected of committing mass atrocities in East Timor. Indonesia set up an ad hoc court for this purpose. The trials were dismissed as a 'whitewash' by serious observers. See, for example, this good Human Rights Watch press release.

Terrorism is a dreadful thing, but surely the magnitude of the killing in East Timor (we're talking about 100,000s of people), and the fact that it was genocide, should give those atrocities far greater weight than the trial of someone who wasn't directly implicated in the Bali bombings, but was implicated as a 'spiritual leader', or inspiration of sorts, for those who committed the bombings? You can safely assume that's a rhetorical question.

What was the Australian response to the ad hoc Court set up in Indonesia to try those responsible for atrocities? I'll have to do some further research to confirm this. But thus far I've struggled to find any official response. (According to Green Left Weekly there was no Australian comment.) There was certainly close to zero media coverage. I can't find any media coverage of Australian criticism of the ad hoc Court.

It's very easy to say that this can all be explained away by human nature. Australians, like all people, will care more for their own than for other nationals. That may or may not be true. I'm not certain that automatically follows in fact (cf the response to the Asian tsunami). What can be said for certain is that if media coverage is close to zero, then no one in this country will know about it. And then you can definitely count on people being 'apathetic' to the lack of justice for those who were directly responsible for mass killings in East Timor.

Not long ago, East Timor decided not to pursue the biggest criminal in Indonesia's Army - the famous General Wiranto. In May last year, the SMH blandly referred to the decision not to pursue the case against the good general as being 'in both nations' interests'. The reality is that East Timor is a wonderfully vulnerable little nation state. That vulnerability is promoted by the lack of political will on Australia's part to assist in the pursuit of Indonesian war criminals. Of course, Australia alone is not to blame. But comparing Australia's response to East Timor with the Bali Bombings (in this case, the sentencing of Bashir) is telling.

There's another connection, something equally appalling, which should be of some concern to anyone who believes in the basic principle that all human life carries the same value. Systematic violence and murder still continues in Indonesia on a daily basis. Again, there is virtually zero coverage of this. To give one example, Indonesia has been implicated in mass atrocities in the western province of Aceh - another part of the archipelago populated by an ethnically distinct group of people who have been seeking independence for well over two decades. The province happens to have some of the richest oil deposits in the region. Australia's response to the Indonesians' violent occupation of Aceh (or 'conflict' for those in polite society) has been to consistently to say that they will respect Indonesia's 'territorial integrity' (which is a direct reference to the UN Charter. You can tell DFAT's legal department's had a hand there. See this Question on Notice prepared by DFAT. Note the date. We were arguing against meddling in a sovereign nation's internal affairs around the same time that we were arguing in favour of invading Iraq, inter alia, on account of the appalling human rights record in that country.). For more info on the conflict in Aceh go here.

Within the comfortable surrounds of my Canberra office, it may serve my good Western conscience well to wave my finger at those corrupt Indonesian jurists for not giving Bashir a heftier sentence. Neglecting the greater context within which Bashir's case sits helps too. It takes significant discipline to maintain that neglect.


Thursday, March 03, 2005
 
Puppy Love

The newspaper recently reported the following...

Two small boys and two girls were married off to puppies by tribal villagers in the small northern Indian state of Jharkhand to ward off evil, a report said.

Local officials in Kuluptang village in Jharkhand said the "kukur vibaha" or dogs' marriages, were organised on the last day of a local tribal festival, the Press Trust of India news agency said.

One of the tribeswomen, 54-year-old Sonamuni, who blessed the marriage of her three-year-old grand-daughter Priya, said the wedding was no less important than other such ceremonies and all customs normally associated with marriage were followed. <--- EWW!

The mother of "groom" Durga, aged one, said if the first tooth of a baby came out in the upper jaw it was considered "inauspicious" for the child as well as the family and dog marriages had to be performed.

After a bath in a nearby river, the children are taken to a place of worship in a procession accompanied by a band.

Neighbours and relatives of the four children danced to music performed by the band before the marriages were solemnised with puppies of the opposite sex, the report said.

Can you imagine being their psychiatrist in later life?!?

Patient: It all started when I was three, when I married a dog...

Doctor: Patient, that's a dreadful way to talk about your wife!

Patient: I know, I know. But she really was a dog. Even slobbered all over me as a sign of affection.

Doctor: Sounds like it wasn't all that bad then, eh? (nudges patient with a rye smile on his face)

Patient: Doof! (punches doctor)


Tuesday, March 01, 2005
 
Taming of the shrew

The last time I had my hair cut Sir Robert Menzies was debating in parliament the efficacy of having communists outlawed. My grandfather was in his mid-twenties. Dwight D Eisenhower was sending American troops to the Korean Peninsula. Such is the bewildering array of curly hairs on my head, that it takes a team of five civil engineers several moments, each morning, to tame my wild strands with the use of a collection of cranes, pulleys and adehsives. Indeed, just yesterday I was biten on my hand by a small jungle snake as I ventured to scratch my scalp. Whilst I'm in desperate need of a haircut, I haven't had one in months. Unfortunately, I believe I have developed a mild phobia for hairdressing salons. No, correction. I've always had a mild phobia for hairdressing salons. Only in Sydney, I could safely venture into the numerous dodgy barbers' shops that littered the Sydney landscape the way overweight public servants litter the edge of Lake Burley Griffin in Canberra. Another problem is the fact that (to me at least) every attempt to leave one's house requires a significant journey by car or bike. Given my recent weekend waking hours, I've found it very difficult to get to a hairsalon before it closes. And, just for the record, I refuse to go to Just Cuts. That place should be called 'Just Cuts, No Dignity'. Big words, I know, especially considering that I have a '$2 off' voucher to the joint. Alas, such is a (small) man's pride!

Powered by Blogger